Erm...

Ok, microsofts webbie says that you can run FSX with as little as 512mb, i have 1gb, will it work?

It may,but you dont list your CPU or GFX.These are both important factors for FSX

ok, here some more info

AMD Athlon64 X2 Dual Core
2.0 gigahertz
NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS

Since I am running it on a P4 2.8 GHz with 612 MB RAM (128 MB shared with and Intel on board GFX), I would say it will run on your computer. You may not be able to move all the settings to ultra high, but you will get better results than I do.

Thanks Crash, i was worried i was gonna have to spend $$$ or in my case £££ upgrading....

If you haven't noticed in previous posts, autogen and traffic are the biggest problem areas. I can have my scenery detail on ultra high, 19m mesh resolved to 1m with no problem, but that is with no autogen and aircraft traffic at zero.

Thanks for the info. Crash, is there ne where besides this Forum that i can see your screenshots?

Sorry about using text speech in my previous post but i was in a rush ^^

It wasn't excessive.

The only public areas they exist is in the FSX forum her. I've ratcheted back the number of shots I've posted because while I have posted them to show what can be done on a mediocre computer, the art critics have decided they weren't worthy of Rembrandt.

I will try to post a few later today under the subject, "for Fryingpan", so yoou can find them.

thank you, ive decided not 2 believe all the crap about you being an idiot, to the contrary, you see like a person who just wants to do what he loves and that is flying, thats fair enough

Hey, the crap may be true. It could just be that I am back on my medication, today.

I can be abrasive and won't back away from an argument. It will surprise people that I don't dislike those I argue with. It would be very boring if there isn't an occasional food fight.

hey, arguments are good! It lets you vent anger... if you didn', you might go psycho