For Fryingpan

Fryingpan, these are some representative screenshots. since I've mentioned my computer specs, they might be helpful in deciding whether yours can handle FSX. They aren't meant as works of art.

KLAX (scenery complexity up, no autogen or traffic)

737-800 3D cockpit (I had to back off scenery complexity or things blurred with the 3d cockpit)

Unless you get extreme, weather can be handled pretty well.

Again, high scenery complexity, but no autogen.

Excellent! Looks way better than my fs9 ever did, and if thats on a mediocre machine, soon as i can afford an upgrade, it will look great!

Thanks Crash

You're welcome. The computer is a stock Dell Dimension 3000, P4 2.8 GHz, 512 MB RAM, 128 MB shared with an Intel 82865G graphics chip.

Mine has slightly more memory and its only 2 ghz but apart from that they are very similar

Crash this is an FSX forum ...Stop posting shots from FS98 please...

Hah, yeah sure... i never really upgrades my fs9 since i never have any money. That is much better than fs9 without (or with few) graphic upgrades

Im sure my friend...I was just kidding with Crash

Money is always an issue ...Thats why i believe that we dont have to be so tough in our critics to people screenshots.

Actually, compared to GM72's screen shots, mine look like FS 95.

This is past ...Beware of the new Super Tera-System of Crash ...Its coming

CrashGordon,
What do you have your settings at. Our computers are very similar and it looks like your shots are very good compared to mine. Also, what is autogen and how do you turn it off like I've often heard you say.
Thanks