| Author |
Message |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:59 am |
|
|
i was wondering if there was any way to get better graphics or ram for a laptop.is there any external system i can get and if so please give me the link to the webpage |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 4:12 pm |
|
|
Thanks but Ive decided to save up and buy a powerfull desktop instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:49 pm |
|
|
Great idea!!!
You'll enjoy it more, post the specs of what your going to get so some of the members that build their own can OK it for you.
Get yourself a nice 24" widescreen monitor.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 11:33 am |
|
|
I was looking at the predetor G7200 by acer.
specs:
AMD Phenom X4 9750 Quad-Core processor
(2.40GHz, 2MB Cache)
Genuine Windows Vista® Home Premium
4GB DDR2 800MHz memory
512MB ATI Radeon HD4850 graphics
640GB SATA hard drive (7200rpm)
Dual Layer DVD Rewriter
I think I might need a 3.00GHz instead of a 2.40GHz.what do you think.
OH and it comes with a 20'' T200 Samsung LCD Monitor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 3:30 pm |
|
|
First, the better the CPU the better the flight Sim will "play", so get the best that you can afford.
Second, if your going to run 2004 not FSX with that machine you will be above to run it full out, to the max.
If you ran FSX you would be well above the default settings, nice nice machine.
20" is very nice, bigger is better especially with the prices today.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:17 pm |
|
|
Thanks for the advice but I just have one more question.I have both fsx and fs2004 installed on my current computer.It takes up a lot of memory and slows my pc down.Would you install both games or just the one on that new acer desktop? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:03 pm |
|
|
Both shouldn't slow down the new machine.
Defrag and try disabling your ani virus as long as you don't go on line while flying.
Don't ever disable the firewall!!!!
Enable the anti virus when you are finished flying.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:27 pm |
|
|
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:52 pm |
|
|
In your opinion which would improve the overall performance of the computer more?Ram or the graphics card |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:57 pm |
|
|
A friend of mine with Vista 64bit and a AMD 6400 just bumped his ram to 8 gigs, but if you have 32bit it won't read it, only 64bit will.
You have a very nice card but there are new ones out that beat your.
I would get the card and leave the ram alone since it can't be read.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929605
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:09 pm |
|
|
but the ram is enough to run fs2004 perfectly even at complex airports such as heathrow from uk2000 isint it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:47 pm |
|
|
More than sufficient as long as you don't have an overabundance of programs running in the background using up "power".
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cheeks Chief Captain


Joined: Oct 09, 2004 Posts: 2508 Location: YSSY |
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:22 am |
|
|
22" screen has already had its effects on my eyes
Especially playing all the FPS etc, I think a 20" is good Please direct your complaints to the moon, they might care there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:05 pm |
|
|
ive found another computer aswell:
specs:
PREMIUM - Intel® Core 2 Quad Processor Q9550 (2.83GHz, 1333MHz, 12MB cache)
Genuine Windows Vista® Home Premium
23in S2309W WIDESCREEN UK Black (1920 x 1080)
1.2 TB (2x 640 GB) Serial ATA (7200 Rpm) Dual HDD Config Raid 0 Stripe
4096MB 1067 MHz Dual Channel DDR3 SDRAM [4x1024]
Graphics 1GB ATI Radeon 3870 X2 graphics card
could you please tell me if this is good enough to run fsx on full settings really smooth and would problems occur if i went with a 64 bit system |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 3:14 pm |
|
|
That looks very very good.
Full out, probably, with AI at 100%...don't know.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flysully Trainee


Joined: May 10, 2008 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:27 pm |
|
|
would a better graphics card make the sim smoother or a bigger processor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RadarMan Chief Captain


Joined: Aug 25, 2003 Posts: 16894 Location: U.S.A |
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:06 pm |
|
|
CPU will make it run faster but the card can give you better visuals and quite often FPS.
The "game" is CPU orientation, the better the chip the better it runs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|