i need to know the name of this TANK

I've had a look around the internet, and can't find the name of it, sorry 😞

I don't know too much about tanks 😉

Although you search in the wrong site it looks like the M109 E4 Howitzer in a newer version...

Good old years of plastic modelism... ❤️

Greekman72 wrote:

Although you search in the wrong site it looks like the M109 E4 Howitzer in a newer version...

Good old years of plastic modelism... ❤️

You could be right, but one thing I do know. You aren't going to get that thing off the ground under it's own power.

WarHawk42 wrote:

Greekman72 wrote:

Although you search in the wrong site it looks like the M109 E4 Howitzer in a newer version...

Good old years of plastic modelism... ❤️

You could be right, but one thing I do know. You aren't going to get that thing off the ground under it's own power.

🍻

Im on the way to buy an AN225 in order to carry it on the skies.... 😉

It looks like you are correct Greekman, I found this.

More for your viewing pleasure here ➡

The abrams is still the best!
Check it out!
http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/uploads/large/OCPA-2005-03-09-165522.jpg

hms_endeavour wrote:

The abrams is still the best!
Check it out!
http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/uploads/large/OCPA-2005-03-09-165522.jpg

More than agree 👍

One small correction. The M109 is not a tank. It is an artillery cannon, mounted on a track armored vehicle. So it's not "cavallry", it is "artillery". It does not hunt other tanks or run over battlefields. It stays back and rains shells wherever ordered.

Just a small correction 😉

The abrams?the abrams is a battlefield tank!

hms_endeavour wrote:

The abrams?the abrams is a battlefield tank!

Who sais the opposite my friend? 😉

This is turning into a battle of tanks

tailhook;
yeah,but,bindolaf than what tank are you talking about??? 😕

The thing in the picture of the original poster, the M109 (NOT the M1) is an artillery unit and not a tank.

Bindolaf wrote:

The thing in the picture of the original poster, the M109 (NOT the M1) is an artillery unit and not a tank.

Correct 👍

Will someone move this mess to the Off-topic forum. A mistake was made in answering the guy who needed to identify a gun.

Now we are paying for it by answering some yutz that does not understand that tanks have nothing to do with FS.

I don't know which is dumber. Asking a question that has nothing to do with FS or wasting a lot of time answering it.

yutz

What this means? ❓

And....please my friend 😀 ...relax...im the dumbest of all cause i first reply to this question,but its ok anyway...
Its not a big deal sometimes to get out of wonderful FS world and discuss some other things...We are not trators to FS..we just let ourselves a litle free...I think this is not wrong 😉 😀

I agree that it has to be in the off-topic forum but again its not a big deal.The title sais excactly to what this topic refering to,so if you ,or me,or any other dont like it he can just not to get in the trouble to open it. 😉

Friendly of course and not offended to you my friend Crash... 😀 😉

Source: Merriam Webster

yutz: a stupid, foolish, or ineffectual person

I don't mind off topic discussions, but there is a forum specifically for the purpose.

Next, someone will start a thread on the preparation of sushi and sashimi in the aircraft forum. 🙄

CrashGordon wrote:

Source: Merriam Webster

yutz: a stupid, foolish, or ineffectual person

I don't mind off topic discussions, but there is a forum specifically for the purpose.

Next, someone will start a thread on the preparation of sushi and sashimi in the aircraft form. 🙄

In the aircraft forum will never happen something like this cause there is TTT as a moderator there.He is s close and notice everything in his forums.

The moderator of this forum is flyaway.Send him a PM in order to move it where it belongs...to the off-topic forum or to the trush can...
Maybe he didnt notice it.
The poster of this topic was a guest.I dont excpect guests to know exactly the rules of this site.
And to prevent you of stating thats why i dont want guests etc. i have to notice that the guests issue has a lot of times been discussed and we have neither a small comment from flyaway,positive or negative...so...Maybe we are talking and hoping without meaning my friend....

Lets get back on flights...Up there things are clearer and simple... 😉