Just wanted to post some comparison shots. I dont have fs2004, so im using fs2002. I have fs2002 settings on full and the demo on default settings
BEFORE:
AFTER:
The default shots look good, you have a nice machine or a good card?
my specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.2Ghz
1gb Ram
ATI Radeon Xpress 200
200gb hdd
is 2002 the before and fsx demo the after?
Faucett wrote:
is 2002 the before and fsx demo the after?
😂 Ya, Its pretty obvious..
ha ha 🙄
Very nice comparisons 👍
my specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.2Ghz
1gb Ram
ATI Radeon Xpress 200
200gb hdd
You did NOT get those shots off THAT system! I have nearly an identical system,
AMD 3400+ @2.4 Ghz
1gb Ram
ATI Radeon Xpress 200
160gb hd
and the card is TERRIBLE. what were your frames? I'm desperately shopping for a better card! Oh yeah, the Amd 3500+ would probably be at a higher Ghz that 2.2
Then again, what do I know?
CtrlAltDlt wrote:
my specs are:
AMD Athlon 64 3500+ @ 2.2Ghz
1gb Ram
ATI Radeon Xpress 200
200gb hddYou did NOT get those shots off THAT system! I have nearly an identical system,
AMD 3400+ @2.4 Ghz
1gb Ram
ATI Radeon Xpress 200
160gb hdand the card is TERRIBLE. what were your frames? I'm desperately shopping for a better card! Oh yeah, the Amd 3500+ would probably be at a higher Ghz that 2.2
Then again, what do I know?
I got 40 frames per second on FS2002 with all settings set to high, and i got 20 frames per second on FSX with all settings set to default.
I searched for info about the amd 3500 and found this:
Im thinking about buying a new computer in february when vista a little after vista comes out. Probably from dell because they have really cheap prices and you can just customize everything.
Flight Sim Questions that are closely related to this...