Fly Away Simulation
SearchSearch 

Shouldent it be FSXI..?

Guest
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:41 pm

1.) FS1: Released 1982
2.) FS2: Released 1984
3.) FS3: Released 1988
4.) FS4: Released 1989
5.) FS5: Released 1993 / FS5.1: Released 1995
6.) FS95: Released 1996
7.) FS98: Released 1997
8.) FS00: Released 1999
9.) FS02: Released 2001
10.) FS04: Released 2003

11.) FSX: Released 2006

😕

5 Responses

Pro Member Chief Captain
Jonathan (99jolegg) Chief Captain
Joined: Jun 26, 2004 Posts: 4127 Location: UK
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:45 pm

FSXI is FS11 so no, it shouldn't. If you meant FSVI (FS06) then yes, it could be, but FSX refers to the version number. FS00 was FS7, FS02 was FS8, FS04 was FS9 so FS06 is FS10 (FSX is slightly more 'slick' sounding).

😉

Pro Member Chief Captain
CrashGordon Chief Captain
Joined: Jun 20, 2005 Posts: 3837
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:09 pm

Actually, if his list of releases is correct, it would be the 11th release.

More research to do. 🙄

Pro Member Chief Captain
CRJCapt Chief Captain
Joined: Sep 12, 2005 Posts: 3729 Location: Ohio,USA
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:16 pm

http://fshistory.simflight.com/fsh/index.htm

Guest
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:49 am

99jolegg wrote:

FSXI is FS11 so no, it shouldn't. If you meant FSVI (FS06) then yes, it could be, but FSX refers to the version number. FS00 was FS7, FS02 was FS8, FS04 was FS9 so FS06 is FS10 (FSX is slightly more 'slick' sounding).

😉

Oh ya i didnt mean the year being 06 (VI) i meant the actual version number. FSX is actually the 11th simulator released from microsoft.. After FS5.1 was released their was FS95 which was FS6, FS98 was FS7, FS00 was FS8, etc.. so FSX would have to be FSXI

Pro Member First Officer
Alec Stelloh (Thunderbirdman2) First Officer
Joined: Jul 28, 2006 Posts: 441 Location: Milwaukee,Wisconsin
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:27 pm

That explains it

All times are GMT Page 1 of 1