FSP Failures

Have a look at this ➡

http://www.fspassengers.com/forum/read.php?f=1&i=19139&t=19085#reply_19139

I have set-up my failures to 17% and i find it challenging and somehow more realistic.My opinion of course. 😉

I have my failures set to 45% with hard failures if they occur, and surprisingly, I get a failure every 1 in 5 flights When they do occur, they test your skills to keep the aircraft in level flight 😳

99jolegg wrote:

I have my failures set to 45% with hard failures if they occur, and surprisingly, I get a failure every 1 in 5 flights When they do occur, they test your skills to keep the aircraft in level flight 😳

Do you have High Cost Company settings too? 😂 😉

😂

No ticket prices are low.....but food and drink is extortionate

😉

99jolegg wrote:

😂

No ticket prices are low.....but food and drink is extortionate

😉

😂 😂 😂

I see...i guess that someone have to need it(psychiatrists suggestion for more extreme life and experience.... ) in order to choose your company Jon. 😉

Greekman72 wrote:

99jolegg wrote:

😂

No ticket prices are low.....but food and drink is extortionate

😉

😂 😂 😂

I see...i guess that someone have to need it(psychiatrists suggestion for more extreme life and experience.... ) in order to choose your company Jon. 😉

Its ok GM....they have roughly a 60% chance or surviving the flight 😂

A ❗ ...OK ❗ ...yeah ❗ ...well i have to start thinking of it. 😂 😉

Greekman72 wrote:

I have set-up my failures to 17% and i find it challenging and somehow more realistic.My opinion of course. 😉

I think that if there were a 17% rate of failure in the real world, no one would be flying.

I take the opposite approach. 1% easy failures. Now, if I can find a way to lock that stewardess who keeps drowning me in coffee, in the cargo hold.

CrashGordon wrote:

Now, if I can find a way to lock that stewardess who keeps drowning me in coffee, in the cargo hold.

You've really got it in for that stewardess haven't you 😂

🍻

CrashGordon wrote:

Greekman72 wrote:

I have set-up my failures to 17% and i find it challenging and somehow more realistic.My opinion of course. 😉

I think that if there were a 17% rate of failure in the real world, no one would be flying.

I take the opposite approach. 1% easy failures. Now, if I can find a way to lock that stewardess who keeps drowning me in coffee, in the cargo hold.

😂 😂 😂

What about Jon's 45%???

99jolegg wrote:

CrashGordon wrote:

Now, if I can find a way to lock that stewardess who keeps drowning me in coffee, in the cargo hold.

You've really got it in for that stewardess haven't you 😂

🍻

Not as much as that wimp of a co-pilot that shouts, "I love you, Mom", just before we all die. 😂

Greekman72 wrote:

CrashGordon wrote:

Greekman72 wrote:

I have set-up my failures to 17% and i find it challenging and somehow more realistic.My opinion of course. 😉

I think that if there were a 17% rate of failure in the real world, no one would be flying.

I take the opposite approach. 1% easy failures. Now, if I can find a way to lock that stewardess who keeps drowning me in coffee, in the cargo hold.

😂 😂 😂

What about Jon's 45%???

I'm not flying on Russian Routlette Airlines. 😂

Adds somewhat more spark to a flight 😉

Isn't the purpose of flights where you have passengers, to be routine...almost to the point of being boring?

👍