Hey all, hear 2004 is a hog. I'm runnin....
2.53g P4 with 1G PC2700 ram, geforc3 ti500 (64mgcard). XP home with plenty of hard drive space.
I can usually get around 35-50 frames out of 2002 with about a med- high set up on the graphics. Decent to look at. Not screenshot quality but good nuf for me.
Do I need to kick out for that geforce fx 5900 yet or can I wait?
Thanks,
tire
7 Answers
Site AdminYes, i'm sure that would be no problem. If you have a bit of spare cash, I would also recommend getting the 5900 - there is a big difference 🙂
First OfficerHi Tiretracks, I have almost same as you..except I use Rambus Ram. It will run OK for you. I also added the 5900 Ultra, and WOW!! I don't think frame rates were much more but I really notice improved graphics. My Asus mobo only supports AGP 4X. Good Luck, rob
Your system should be ok for running FS2004 at lower setting, but a graphics card upgrade always helps.
First Officerlooks good to me... BTW if you think FS9 is a hog...take alook at some (mostly all) of the posts in the FSX forum..."FSX runs horibbly on my comp?, Why wont FSX run on my comp?". all the answers...You need a really good computer to run FSX. 😉
Chief CaptainYou do realise the orignal post was in 2003
Captainhow did this old post end up at the front anyway? Oh well 😎
First Officeroops 
. a guest posted on a 2 year old topic and then i posted after...thats how it ended up at the front.
If the question and answers provided above do not answer your specific question - why not ask a new question of your own? Our community and flight simulator experts will provided a dedicated and unique answer to your flight sim question. And, you don't even need to register to post your question!
Flight Sim Questions that are closely related to this...
Jump to latest
